Kunel and ChatGPT

[giantkiller]

How does one go about massaging the opposition between like magnetic fields
ChatGPT said:

Massaging the opposition between like magnetic fields—meaning two north poles or two south poles repelling each other—is less about overcoming the physical repulsion and more about managing or manipulating it through creative design or physics-informed engineering. Here's how one can approach it, depending on the context:
1. Magnetic Shielding or Redirection

You can't cancel a magnetic field, but you can redirect it. Materials like mu-metal or other high-permeability alloys can help channel magnetic lines of force, allowing you to mitigate repulsion at specific points.

    Use case: In magnetic levitation or containment systems.

    Goal: To avoid direct face-to-face repulsion while maintaining proximity.

2. Angular Alignment (Tilted Interaction)

Instead of placing like poles directly facing each other, tilting the magnets can reduce the direct repulsive force and sometimes introduce a component of torque that can be managed or exploited (e.g., in magnetic bearings or motors).

    Use case: In rotational devices or precision tools.

    Goal: Harness side components of the field instead of frontal repulsion.

3. Distance Damping with Intermediate Media

Inserting non-magnetic but structural spacers can maintain a set distance between like poles and dampen the repulsion's effect while allowing the field interaction to persist in a controlled way.

    Use case: In magnetic suspension systems or vibration damping.

    Goal: Controlled repulsion for cushioning or stabilization.

4. Dynamic Control via Electromagnets

If you're using electromagnets rather than permanent magnets, you can adjust the field strength or even switch polarity dynamically, giving you full control over repulsion and attraction on demand.

    Use case: Magnetic actuators, maglev systems.

    Goal: Tunable repulsion for dynamic environments.

5. Superconducting Levitation (Meissner Effect)

Superconductors can "repel" magnetic fields in a different way, leading to quantum locking and stable levitation without the need to massage the opposition directly.

    Use case: Quantum transport, frictionless bearings.

    Goal: Harnessing repulsion as a stable, useful force.

Would you like help with a specific application, like magnetic levitation or energy storage?
You said:
How do I reproduce the redirection of magnetic fields in the Kunel patent?
ChatGPT said:

To reproduce the magnetic field redirection described in Heinrich Kunel's 1982 patent (DE3024814), you'll need to construct a system that manipulates the magnetic flux from permanent magnets without mechanical motion. Kunel's design utilizes a combination of permanent magnets, soft magnetic cores, and alternating current (AC) coils to induce a temporally variable magnetic flux, which in turn generates an electric current.
free-energy-info.co.uk+1Scribd+1
Scribd+1free-energy-info.co.uk+1
Key Components and Setup

    Permanent Magnet Block: A permanent magnet serves as the primary source of magnetic flux.

    Soft Magnetic Core: An iron core (e.g., made of dynamo iron, pure iron, or amorphous iron) is connected to one or both poles of the permanent magnet. This core channels the magnetic flux.
    Scribd

    Induction Coil: A coil is wound around the core. The number of turns and the conductor's cross-sectional area should match those of the circuit breaker coil to ensure efficient induction.
    Scribd

    Circuit Breaker Coil: An AC coil is placed adjacent to the magnet block. The alternating current in this coil creates a time-varying magnetic field that modulates the flux through the core.
    Scribd

    Air Gap: An air gap is introduced between the core and the magnet block. This gap acts as a "gate" or "circuit breaker" for the magnetic flux, allowing for its temporal modification.
    Scribd

Operational Principle

    When the AC current flows through the circuit breaker coil, it alternately directs the induced magnetic flux toward and away from the core.
    Scribd+1free-energy-info.co.uk+1

    This modulation of the magnetic flux induces a pulsating direct current in the induction coil.

    The frequency of the AC current determines the rate of flux modulation, and consequently, the frequency of the induced current.

Practical Considerations

    Core Material: Use materials with low core losses to minimize energy dissipation.

    Coil Design: Ensure that the induction coil has a sufficient number of turns and appropriate wire gauge to handle the induced current.

    Frequency Control: Adjust the frequency of the AC supply to control the characteristics of the induced current.

    Safety: Implement proper insulation and safety measures to handle the generated currents and voltages.
 

For a detailed schematic and further insights into Kunel's design, refer to the translated patent document

[giantkiller]

Proof that AI can only repeat what is out there already.
ChapGPT is exposing the truth about the tech. But as one can read there is no reasoning power.
This is why one reading and understanding the content of the patent can readily use that knowledge to assess work ability in any published or posted design.
The working units all encompass magnets i.e. Bedini, Muller, Mark. Don Smith attacked the resonant field with a spark gap alone. Bedini attached the field. Muller broke the field. Mark spark gapped the flux of the weak magnet.

Whats interesting is this patent describes in clear and uncertain ways of the protocol. We will call it the Kunel protocol as it explicitly describes what all the other advertisers wont. He does not obfuscate one bit. He can not because the process is so simple. All other Over Unity builds in some form or fashion rely on this protocol.
The fool's errand is thinking that Cu to Cu coupling will ever work. It wont. There is no magnetic ability for field sustainment. The builds that include Fe and magnets have the ringing capability because of the flux in the magnet and the hysteresis in the Fe when saturated.
The Kunel build is a metalized Tesla coil. The compression coil or circuit breaker coil #3 is a helical primary while the Fe bar is the secondary.
The #3 ejects energy laterally into the flux field and helically emits up the bar and down to the magnet. The receiver coils #4 are the head element that capture the ejections.
But this is all spelled out in the patent quite plainly.
So why the struggle? I dont know.
The Kunel unit is a meticulous balance between volume of materials, strength of the magnet, the spacing of the coils in all directions, and the content of where each material is made. All builds will be different. Different builders, different benches, different tools. Its finnicky.
The circuit is made of obvious stages and some with actual values.
Hopefully this can direct any who wants something to work.
It is a transmitter / receiver closely coupled for feedback. The long distance has been replaced by a direct inclusion of flux density of a near field supply, the magnet. The saturated Fe can not hold all the activity. The loops being directional.

[web000x]

Whats interesting is this patent describes in clear and uncertain ways of the protocol. We will call it the Kunel protocol as it explicitly describes what all the other advertisers wont. He does not obfuscate one bit. He can not because the process is so simple. All other Over Unity builds in some form or fashion rely on this protocol.

I am hearing that Kunel reported that the patent covers just enough to protect the invention but doesn't give all of the necessary details.  What would you say are important features which may have been left out?  Is it the use of dissimilar metallic conductors?

Thanks,

Dave

[F6FLT]

Proof that AI can only repeat what is out there already.
ChapGPT is exposing the truth about the tech. But as one can read there is no reasoning power.
...

Isn't it because it doesn't say what you want to hear? 
Try Deepseek instead. I found it better than Chatgpt on technical questions.

[JimBoot]

"Proof that AI can only repeat what is out there already." depends on the model and how you prompt/jailbreak it.

[F6FLT]

"Proof that AI can only repeat what is out there already." depends on the model and how you prompt/jailbreak it.

AI repeats, but so does human intelligence. Whether it's scientists repeating that energy is conserved, based on proven experiments and theories, or FE "specialists" repeating that energy is everywhere and all you have to do is take it, based on their dreams or frauds, they repeat.

Where we'll see real intelligence is in the discovery or invention of something truly new. Right now, in the AI/human competition, the score is AI:0, Human:>>0.  I think this will change considerably in the future.

[Allcanadian]

"Proof that AI can only repeat what is out there already." depends on the model and how you prompt/jailbreak it.

Hey Jim, I think your correct.

An AI cannot know what is not specifically in it's data base just like people. However there is the possibility that it could be coaxed to deduce something following a series of loaded questions of what is in it's data base. In effect putting two and two together for us. It all comes down to the way we reason based on the information at hand.

I like to ask "suppose this happens, then what?" kinds of questions. So our AI gives us an answer to a question. Then we ask what if this variable changed then what?. How could this variable change based on the energy within the system including any external energy sources and the conversion of said energy. In what way could external energy sources be included in the system and what would be the result?.

In this way we could lead the AI on as it leads us on generating new ideas we may have not considered.

[Allcanadian]

F6FLT

Where we'll see real intelligence is in the discovery or invention of something truly new. Right now, in the AI/human competition, the score is AI:0, Human:>>0.  I think this will change considerably in the future.

In some sense it has already happened. Looking at the work of Viktor Schauberger I realized nature is light years ahead of mankind. So it was no surprise that when an AI was asked to design the best most efficient part it chose organic designs with no straight lines like we see in nature.

Another new AI related technology we see everywhere in nature is organic designed internal geometry. That is a substructure within a structure making something magnitudes stronger, lighter and more efficient. This is a very important concept.

Funny how the AI was not specifically asked to use natural or organic structures. It was only asked to design the most efficient part any way possible. The AI chose nature over any man made designs just like most FE inventors of the past. Almost all FE inventors claimed "nature" was their inspiration not other people.

So once again it seems your barking up the wrong tree.

AC

[Allcanadian]

A little more on AI and the Kunel device I partially replicated.

Question to ChatGPT

Is a straight line the most efficient path of an electric current?.

Answer:

Not necessarily. While a straight line is the shortest distance between two points, electric current doesn't always follow a straight-line path due to the following key factors:

1)Path of Least Resistance (Not Shortest Path):
Current flows along the path of least resistance, not necessarily the shortest geometric path.
For example, if a longer path has lower resistance (e.g., thicker or more conductive material), more current will flow through it.

2)Circuit Design:
In practical circuits, wires, components, and connections are placed according to design constraints, not straight lines. The physical layout of a circuit board often routes current in curves or angles.

3)Electromagnetic Fields:
In AC (alternating current) systems, especially at high frequencies, current distribution can be affected by inductance, capacitance, and the skin effect—causing current to take more complex paths.

Here we are speaking of Advanced Electrodynamics unlike most people are familiar with. The path of little or no resistance not the overly simplistic shortest path between two points. As the AI explains...

"In simple circuits with uniform material and direct connections, the straight line may be efficient. But in real-world systems—like circuit boards, biological tissues, or lightning paths—the most efficient route is often curved or branched."

AC

[giantkiller]

Schauberger uses the resonant  flow pressure while Keely uses kinetic pressure.
Kunel was slick. The TPU is the process. The difference? Kunel showed a lot of iron. This creates too much attraction whereas SM showed minimal iron wire to stretch out the attraction making it easier to break and resonate. Kunel did not have to produce a physical build so the amount of Fe wire is hidden. SM uses a cabinet magnet in all the TPUs. The argument is 'no he didnt' because we never saw the placement. But we do in the hotel on the 6"inch where he pockets one and the LTPU where he sticks the cabmag on  the side and leaves it there to switch hands. It stays in the middle of the TPU height because there is where it is.