PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2026-08-14, 20:41:20
News: Registration with the OUR forum is by admin approval.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15]
Author Topic: Transformer Induction  (Read 41381 times)

Group: Mad Scientist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1241
oops.. 12turn.   i see it now

so it pulled toward the primary.... 

firstly, to understand more is, lets say that maybe the wire 'was' pulled in to the primary by magnetic interaction.

if we hung 2 wires losely and horizontally instead.  quarter in between them. if we power both wires, same polarity, if there is movement of the wires in reference to each other, the movement should be opposite of just powering 1 of those wires and loop shorting the other.  the loop shorting example should be the same as your example.  by the way, thanks for doing that.

simple stuff.  like i said, will do some of these simple things this weekend. trying to figure out why i cant log in to my magluvin youtube channel.

mags
   
Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2307
Primary ?!  No, we are talking about "induced" current in a wire so this implies "secondary".  There is a fundamental difference between the "inducing" and the "induced" circuit.
The resistance of the primary (the winding that generates the main magnetic flux in the core and leakage flux in its hole) is not relevant to this discussion.

PM stated- "So, the current in the primary will not change polarity but will simply rise to a peak and then return to zero."

Your reply-  "That's right but only below some L/R ratio vs. risetime and always when the resistance of the circuit is zero.
For an electric current to flow along the wire, the wire must be a part of a closed circuit / loop."


Context is everything and here you respond to my comment about the primary's current waveform.  Now you say you were referring to a secondary??!??

Also, the primary induces the single wire via the H-Field.

Pm
   
Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2307
oops.. 12turn.   i see it now

so it pulled toward the primary.... 

firstly, to understand more is, lets say that maybe the wire 'was' pulled in to the primary by magnetic interaction.

if we hung 2 wires losely and horizontally instead.  quarter in between them. if we power both wires, same polarity, if there is movement of the wires in reference to each other, the movement should be opposite of just powering 1 of those wires and loop shorting the other.  the loop shorting example should be the same as your example.  by the way, thanks for doing that.

simple stuff.  like i said, will do some of these simple things this weekend. trying to figure out why i cant log in to my magluvin youtube channel.

mags

I am not saying the loose wire was pulled to the primary by induction force but rather heat expansion gave it the ability of moving towards the primary.

Pm
   

Group: Mad Scientist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1241
how can you be sure?  other than that, do you conclude that the wire will not move in he core when the primary is active, because it was heat flexing the wire?


mags


   
Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2307
how can you be sure?  other than that, do you conclude that the wire will not move in he core when the primary is active, because it was heat flexing the wire?


mags

I find no visible movement in the wire that should be caused by forces from the H-Field in the many tests I've run.  Either the wire is too stiff, or the forces are too weak, or occur at too high a speed to be visible, or.....?  I only see movement when the wire is heated and the direction is easily influenced by the slight bend in the wire.  The core can be rotated so the primary is in a different position relative to the wire and the deflection of the wire still remains the same direction.

My conclusion is that I see no deflection in the wire resulting from H-Field forces.

Pm
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4856
So, the current in the primary will not change polarity but will simply rise to a peak and then return to zero. Therefore, the deflection will be in the same direction for the entire cycle.

Context is everything and here you respond to my comment about the primary's current waveform.  Now you say you were referring to a secondary??!??
I was certain that your statement referred to the secondary because it mentioned a "deflection".   I answered about the current induced in the secondary because I thought that is where the "deflection" took place.
My answer is not applicable to the primary current.

I will not provide a reply about the current induced in the primary because the current in the primary can be anything that the power supply (i.e. bridge) pushes into it.
   
Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2307
I was certain that your statement referred to the secondary because it mentioned a "deflection".   I answered about the current induced in the secondary because I thought that is where the "deflection" took place.
My answer is not applicable to the primary current.

I will not provide a reply about the current induced in the primary because the current in the primary can be anything that the power supply (i.e. bridge) pushes into it.

OK, I understand your explanation above.   

Thank you.

Pm
   

Group: Mad Scientist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 1241
thats fair. if it didnt move, but it seems like it should have, what do you think is happening here vs 2 hanging wires close to one another as described earlier. have a vid.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1JZLKvWO0ks
im at home.  its raining cats and electrons.  see if i can get to my shop to do some things later.

mags
   
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15]
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2026-08-14, 20:41:20