|
this is weird watching it, the blue arrow I think is following a 5/6 ratio, so many of these showing different things but wrong,
You may not notice that the blue inner gear is actually moving, place your mouse pointer on a spot that the blue ring passes, then you can see that it is orbiting.
If this actually works in the real world I am stuck asking why we are not already using this relationship, it is so simple, why was I not taught this in school?
So the 3 AIs agree on the geometry, they agree on the kinematics, but the energy created big hurdles so the write up from Chatgtp did not go into energy. Gemini was excited about the force multiplication to the pivot, that is no big deal because the pivot does not move, but it showed that the full path from the ring/sun mesh to pivot is a real path and that the frame is absorbing a large amount of force.
With the sim that is the .txt file that you change to html, (read the file first if you don't feel safe with doing that), It shows all the motions very well, the input from the cross slide assembly orbits the blue gear and provides some force to that orbit that is then transferred into the ring gear, there can be no argument there from any person or AI, That ring gear then must push back on the force that the sun is trying to apply, Newton. Kinematics then tell the path and velocities and all that that the geometry creates by virtue of the hard bodies existing and in intimate contact, the system is a whole closed system. That means that the ring gear must rotate and that the arm must follow,, and then you get the full force flow, input from sun to ring, ring through the pin that is fixed to the arm and that the ring must rotate around that pin, but for the ring to spin and supply a counter force to the sun mesh it must apply that into the pin, Newton, and then the arm has a reactionary force that then pushes on the pivot. All of this passes the scrutiny of the 3 AIs WHEN they are held to the testing protocol as outlined by Chatgtp and me, and Claude, and Gemini,, my idea there feedback and push push push back.
The energy for the 1N at the sun/ring mesh is 0.0628J per cycle, again this part has no push back, it is when then you look at the ring to pin exchange, that energy is 0.628J, no typo that is 10x more out. Now the thing is they all agree on the force from the ring gear, and they all agree that the ring must rotate and they all can identify all of the other forces, but that one creates problems.
|
Author
Topic: Eccentric device (Read 630 times)
