Help!

[Leedskalnin]

Hi!

After many days of being member in this forum this is my first post.

I have purchased Trevor James Constable DVD package on Rain Engineering. After I saw all the DVD package I did not found out how to make for my self some of Trevor's apparatus there were no "how to" guides.   
All of his apparatus seems to be simple, he mentioned many times that he has fine tuned the geometry to Phi and Aether But I dont know how to do that. I know how Reich Cloud Buster works but seems Trevor's acts faster and better

Can any one help me to found out how to tune or make at least one of his geometries.
Below is Spider one of his design, He said Spider is made of Fine Tuned Phi section cones that rotate arount the central axis . 

Many thanks in Advance
PS Excuse me for my English

[poynt99]

I haven't a clue.

Perhaps you should ask Trevor himself?

.99

[Leedskalnin]

I haven't a clue.

Perhaps you should ask Trevor himself?

.99

Thanks poynt!
Fast Response!

Preferably I need some resources on how Aether interacts with moving geometries.

[Leedskalnin]

Seems no one can help 

[poynt99]

Seems no one can help 

I would encourage you to read some Aspden, Aetherometry, Reich, Markovich etc. Google aetherometry.

Try those.

.99

[Grumpy]

This is different than anything that I am doing.  I would look for published writings of Wilhelm Reich on orgone and cloudbusting and what others have done since he published his findings.  Also, the "Joe Cell" seems related.

[Peterae]

I think that's the problem, it's quiet a unique research angle for us switch flickers 

[giantkiller]

Dale Pond's book about John Worrell Keely is a real eye opener. The over all theme is about resonant high pressure because he did not work with voltage but fluid dynamics.
It occured to me that both could be the same thing.

[Leedskalnin]

Thank you all for your responses. I'll track your guidance.

Dear Grumpy

I remember some where in OU forum you mentioned that all moving objects produce Scalar waves, what type of geometries do you think act or influence  better on medium(Aether or ...)? Does moving cones in a circle make a vortex?

leed

[Leedskalnin]

This is different than anything that I am doing.  I would look for published writings of Wilhelm Reich on orgone and cloudbusting and what others have done since he published his findings.  Also, the "Joe Cell" seems related.

hmm Joe Cell is smillar to Aspend capacitor 

[exnihiloest]

...
I remember some where in OU forum you mentioned that all moving objects produce Scalar waves, what type of geometries do you think act or influence  better on medium(Aether or ...)?
...

It can not be stressed enough: scalar waves are entirely based on a misconception of varying near fields.
A wave is something that carries energy and propagates autonomously.
A varying field, which can vary because its source moves (moving objects) or is modulated, is still coupled to the source. Even though the energy in a field can be captured by a near receiver, the field doesn't propagate by itself unlike an electromagnetic wave. 
For example the magnetic field from a coil or from a moving magnet can be caught by another coupled coil, at the expense of the energy provided by the source (electrical or mechanical, depending on what makes the field to vary).
I'm sorry to see too frequently in the spotlight this so-called "scalar wave" which is not a wave but a field, and has always been a theoretical and experimental dead-end for free energy.

[Leedskalnin]

It can not be stressed enough: scalar waves are entirely based on a misconception of varying near fields.
A wave is something that carries energy and propagates autonomously.
A varying field, which can vary because its source moves (moving objects) or is modulated, is still coupled to the source. Even though the energy in a field can be captured by a near receiver, the field doesn't propagate by itself unlike an electromagnetic wave. 
For example the magnetic field from a coil or from a moving magnet can be caught by another coupled coil, at the expense of the energy provided by the source (electrical or mechanical, depending on what makes the field to vary).
I'm sorry to see too frequently in the spotlight this so-called "scalar wave" which is not a wave but a field, and has always been a theoretical and experimental dead-end for free energy.

Thanks exnihiloest.

I agree that we have field not wave but I used that term because that mistakenly has been known as wave. I did mean medium rarefaction or compression propagation(using sound wave in air analogy, Tesla said that light is a sound wave in the Aether) when a material object moves through medium it generates such disturbances in medium if we could use a proper geometry we can manipulate medium but why cones do this better?!

[exnihiloest]

...
I did mean medium rarefaction or compression propagation(using sound wave in air analogy, Tesla said that light is a sound wave in the Aether) when a material object moves through medium it generates such disturbances in medium if we could use a proper geometry we can manipulate medium but why cones do this better?!

Tesla was a genius inventor nevertheless with his longitudinal waves, he was wrong vs Maxwell. Light or EM waves are not like sound waves, and energy transmission at a distance by LC coupled circuits are perfectly modelized by Maxwell's equations.
Even if we consider that EM fields are a medium perturbation (I agree with this idea), the propagating perturbation is transversal. The longitudinal perturbation (for example due to the Coulomb field of a charge oscillating back and forth) generates really disturbances in medium but the disturbances doesn't propagate by themselves, the varying field remains linked to its source.
In any case, we need energy to perturb the medium and there is neither experimental nor theoretical evidence that the energy (propagating or not) that we could recover from the medium could be more than that we have put in.
Another way would be to catch energy already present, called "ambient energy". But conventional electric/magnetic fields such EM waves from human activities or stationary waves around the earth at Schumann Resonance are by far too weak for a practical interest. The ZPF remains a promising way now the question is "how to recover an energy that lies at its minimal level".