author=CITFTA link=topic=3776.msg74741#msg74741 date=1558603945]
I am not sure how you came to that conclusion from the article. It clearly stated that nearly all animal species on earth were very close to the same age. How could that be if they somehow evolved? It also showed that there were clear genetic boundaries between the species. So how could that be if all animals evolved from other animals.
Of course there are boundaries,if there was not,then evolution could of never happened,and there would be no different species of animal. But we all have !some! common genes,as we all started from the same organisms.
This video clearly explains all you need to know as to how evolution was possible.
I hope you take the time to watch it,as i have taken the time to watch what you have shared
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOfRN0KihOUThe study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today, including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.
That is one of my points.
According to the bible and your beliefs,didn't all life start only 6000 odd years ago ?.
There seems to be between a 1666% and 3333% difference between your posted study and the bible ?.
Then there is the fact that it was 9 out of 10,where the amount of different species studied was 100,000
So what about the other 10,000 different species that may have survived through things like ice ages and the likes?. Why are they conveniently left out?.
They also gave reason for this as well,which is very understandable
Quote:
A likely possibility is the occurrence of a sudden event that caused large-scale environmental trauma and wiped out majority of the Earth's species.
"Viruses, ice ages, successful new competitors, loss of prey — all these may cause periods when the population of an animal drops sharply," explains Jesse Ausubel, director of the Program for the Human Environment.Now we know there have been such events as ice ages and the like's.
Then there is there idea of !the same time!,which is between 100,000 years,and 200,000 years.
Now,a lot can happen in 100,000.
The absence of "in-between" species is something that also perplexed Darwin, he said.
First we need to know at what stage did our ancestors become man?,who makes that definition?.
Second-today we have a far better understanding of how things went,due to the much more advanced equipment and ways we have developed to look into our past. Darwin had very little to help him out in this way.
And what exactly is an !in between! spesies?.
And most of the article was trying to figure out how to explain that and have it make sense and still cling to the myth of evolution. Which they were not able to successfully do.
When you watch the video i posted,and see how things happen in the evolutionary chain of life,then there article makes perfect sense.
What is also dose !once again!is show life existed way beyond the 6000 odd years quoted by the bible.
This is a link you provided Carroll,and for the reason above is why i asked you if you actually read the article,or if you posted the wrong one.
I am now going to finish watching the video you provided a few posts ago,and see what else the indian fellow has to say.
Brad
Never let your schooling get in the way of your education.