F6FLT: You do make some solid points however - without being corny - I'm not your average builder - I will be going above and beyond to get there with this.
I'm just buzzed that this place exists frankly and I have other people to discuss this with , for real.
I do have an idea of my own but I will be addressing that once I have something resembling a partly completed circuit - that's just how I work - I have to have something in front of me - takes me forever to start - but don't doubt my tinkering and guessing skills off the bat - they're often uncanny - and this is coming from a very self-critical person.
HAKASAYS: I definitely don't expect immediate results - if I can just get this spinning - as mentioned above - I'll be on my way. If this design is spinning, then it is generating cold spikes in principle anyway, they are the generation and propulsion combined, apparently. If any of you reading this are accomplished builders and feel like giving this particular design a shot and giving me some pointers, I'd be over the moon, so to speak. Re. the horror of inability to replicate, don't worry about that, I'm very particular about notes and specificities. If something has to stay put I make doubly & triply sure that it stays right there - in terms of software or hardware or otherwise. I'm known to overengineer because it's always easier in the long run.
CHET K: Of course there are, and I commend them all, successful or otherwise. Thankyou re. your offer - look forward to any updates. If he's real then the guy's truly anonymous lol If I designed this, I would certainly feel that a basic outline of the parameters would be sufficient and fair - anything more elaborate could reveal identities etc. Re. the "H" word - I didn't mean here - I only just joined - good to know it's a calm crowd here though. I meant elsewhere, in real life and reddit for example, people are so damn sure that these things are impossible but I think given both sides of the argument and the reasoning behind each, in a most macro & unbiased perspective, the argument that suggests a maintained narrative is much more credible than "we still need to spin a big ass turbine with uranium/coal/gas/wind" etc It's beyond the point of debate in my mind - of course large corporations don't want this - and of course, the techniques and materials involved will be somewhat difficult to acquire, even for those in G7 nations - but not impossible.
« Last Edit: 2022-11-12, 00:48:36 by Renaissance Rising »
---------------------------
|