Simplicity

[giantkiller]

New discovery. I found this 2 months ago and posted around a number of sites. I have received no arguments nor validation.
Spherics calls it Lensing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kz64vAEQMuU
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6eR2K4ERFfA

[Verpies]

I have received no arguments nor validation.

It's not surprising.  The guy manifests no knowledge about decomposotion of vectors into their components nor vector fields nor continuous gradients.

[giantkiller]

https://youtu.be/xqKgVVmcCto

[Magluvin]

Nice demo. 

mags

[giantkiller]

Otis T Carr, John Searle, & David Hamel all built two craft each. The first craft of each man took off vertically and was never seen again. They all built a second version and added controls. The government stepped in and shut them down. And they were all mocked.
I am adding Eric Laithwaithe in the mix with my demo. Like Eric, I too have witnessed things that the Abominable No men has never seen or dispel.
An Hv charge will added in the future tests to add T.T.Brown in too.

[Allcanadian]

https://youtu.be/xqKgVVmcCto

The primary fields E,B,G move with the source but does not rotate on axis with it. Similar to why radiated light does not rotate with a rotating light bulb. The misconception of rotating fields came about because some people thought the field lines were real instead of imaginary as a form of notation.

I found it easier to simply discard the notion of a magnetic field and see it as a motional electric field. All magnetism is due to electron orbit and spin which is really no different than the electrons moving in circles in the conductors of a solenoid coil. The electron is made of even smaller particles moving in a circle within the electron as it spins. One could speculate that the subatomic particles within the electrons in a magnet are simply effecting other subatomic particles exterior to it giving the false appearance of a field or action at at distance. This theory was held by Nikola Tesla who believed all action was kinetic in it's nature. This theory would seem to hold water considering that were always discovering new particles smaller than we thought possible.

It could be that the smallest particles are massless which is just another way of saying not having the property of inertia. In effect, nothing "moves" as we perceive it and acts more like a pressure wave moving through water. This could be why the Michelson-Morley experiment did not detect an aether or fabric of space.

[Centraflow]

The primary fields E,B,G move with the source but does not rotate on axis with it. Similar to why radiated light does not rotate with a rotating light bulb. The misconception of rotating fields came about because some people thought the field lines were real instead of imaginary as a form of notation.

I found it easier to simply discard the notion of a magnetic field and see it as a motional electric field. All magnetism is due to electron orbit and spin which is really no different than the electrons moving in circles in the conductors of a solenoid coil. The electron is made of even smaller particles moving in a circle within the electron as it spins. One could speculate that the subatomic particles within the electrons in a magnet are simply effecting other subatomic particles exterior to it giving the false appearance of a field or action at at distance. This theory was held by Nikola Tesla who believed all action was kinetic in it's nature. This theory would seem to hold water considering that were always discovering new particles smaller than we thought possible.

It could be that the smallest particles are massless which is just another way of saying not having the property of inertia. In effect, nothing "moves" as we perceive it and acts more like a pressure wave moving through water. This could be why the Michelson-Morley experiment did not detect an aether or fabric of space.

This is the best instructional video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OI_HFnNTfyU

If nobody wants to watch the whole video go to the 10min mark, but I suggest you watch it all.

[Allcanadian]

This is the best instructional video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OI_HFnNTfyU

If nobody wants to watch the whole video go to the 10min mark, but I suggest you watch it all.

Thanks for the video, I really like these old videos and lectures which demonstrated an idea or effect without all the bias we see today. As if to say, here is the idea, think what you may.