@overboard Like I said, Public domain now. This is not the same old sht Allcanadian. Sorry I didn't post back but I never did see your pictures here. In any case the first issue we encounter with these kinds of devices is that as the mass moves outward from the center of rotation it's velocity thus it's momentum increases in proportion to the distance from center. This is the old figure skater thing... arms out slow down arms in speed up and momentum is conserved. As well if you place the mass on a lever the fulcrum of the lever attached to the disk produces the same effect at the center of rotation. The thing to remember is all the elements moving about the point of rotation may appear to act independently but all must be attached thus all are bound to that system. I have been all through this, done all the experiments for real... no simulators... and threw everything I had at it and came up short. I have went through hundreds of designs many I literally knew must work but when I built them unfortunately none did. So my only advice would be to say if you have actually built it and it works then your the man however if you are depending on a simulation then you might want to ready yourself for a bit of disappointment. However in either case we usually learn some valuable lessons and I consider it time well spent. I have little interest in this kind of device anymore however I have learned a few tricks I could share. First any mass attached to the disk or center of rotation which moves away or towards the center undergoes a change in momentum which translates back to the center. Did you get that?, I'm guessing no... mass attached to center ...change in momentum. However there is no rule saying it must always be attached to the disk thus the center and if it ever became detached from the disk for any period then it has left the inertial/momentum system. I believe this is what Johann Bessler was doing and if the rules say it cannot work then obviously we need to change the rules. My rules... any mass which moves to the exact center of rotation is no longer in the inertial system. Any mass which becomes detached from the center of rotation is considered to be no longer in the inertial system for the duration it has become detached from the system. Case in point... Johann Bessler... a mass falls from the wheel then falls hitting a spring at the neutral center of rotation and bounces to another point on the wheel. Thus for a period of time the mass must be considered as completely outside the closed system for the duration of the time it is in the air during the bounce. You see we have introduced a new variable which is time outside the context of the system. The lesson here is that we are only limited by our creativity in solving a problem not by some numbers man who couldn't think there way out of a paper bag. Me I improve everything I come into contact with, it's easy and comes naturally unfortunately some people have gone through their whole lives and never really improved anything. What we know doesn't mean jack shit unless we can improve on what others have done otherwise we are no better than them and we have done nothing. Progress matters. Sorry for the rant  AC
« Last Edit: 2015-04-09, 05:34:09 by Allcanadian »
---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger
“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
|
feature is available which provides a place all members can chat, either publicly or privately.
Author
Topic: Constant Shifting center of mass motor (Read 56960 times)
