ION,
I agree with you here. Perhaps more power is not needed for successful looping, but maybe it would be useful to have higher power levels to help solidify accurate measurements for easier confirmation the device has a COP>1.
What is really interesting to me at this point is TK's preliminary proof of loaded external induction not affecting the input power in a negative way abut rather positively. IOW, does this mean that induction by displacement current is basically one-way, no lenz effect? I've wondered this for a long time and TK has shown an easy way to test this. This may also be a path for successful looping.
Is this all beginning to somewhat resemble the FTPU to you?
The regenerative issue is a big thing and certainly deserves discussion. I hope we reach these kinds of problems !
Pm
Agreed on all points, especially scaling this up for higher output should be part of the discussion. Just driving it harder may just give the same COP, but at higher power levels. Part of the investigation needs to be alternate topologies that would increase the COP. Nevertheless the results look very good and are adequate for looping. My reservations are with measurements, but outside of the two schematics presented way back, I can't come up with anything that would help at this point. (disclaimer: if anyone also did, I missed it) The displacement current Lenzeless idea is interesting. An LED by itself half wave loads the coil which can be good or bad, TBD. I would like to see TK replace the LED with a "grain of wheat" lamp which he has eyeball pre-calibrated for approximate known brightness vs mW. Then down the road he could use the temp or brightness measuring methods we all know and enjoy. Regards
---------------------------
"Secrecy, secret societies and secret groups have always been repugnant to a free and open society"......John F Kennedy
|