PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2026-02-12, 03:37:18
News: Forum TIP:
The SHOUT BOX deletes messages after 3 hours. It is NOT meant to have lengthy conversations in. Use the Chat feature instead.

Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Free energy is easy, ask an intelligent question...  (Read 11510 times)
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 293
Is that guy that had the Aquarium kapanadze device built still around, kapanadze cheated him for I think $10,000.

Ironically (since you're actually replying to the man himself), I believe that was Aking.21.
   

Hero Member
*****

Posts: 557


Buy me some coffee
It was actually 20K. He was  on a salary. Add up the cost of the equipment he charged us and air flights etc and it totaled out at about 20k dollars.
Yes, I gave the spec for the Aquarium2.  (I should have insisted it was without an earth ground.)  20:20 vision in hindsight.


---------------------------
Electrostatic induction: Put a 1KV charge on 1 plate of a capacitor. What does the environment do to the 2nd  plate?
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 516
I believe it would not work without ground connection to the quite substantial source of electrons.
   
Group: Tinkerer
Full Member
***

Posts: 166
Aking.21 I would think the ground played no part in its operation.With kapanadze he was full
of tricks I think the ground wire was one,it also created a point where it could be faked.
There are a lot of very smart people here,they think in conventional ways,the tpu and kaps
device
operate in a combination of conventional and unknown principles,very hard to solve.Heres one
where the current in the kap device is generated is in the coil,in the tpu, its in the windings
it generates  massive current pulses.The important factor is the length not how its wound.
In the aquarium 2 device you have a situation where the main part of transformers windings
can not source the current needed to power the heater.In my pinion the first part
of the transformer supplies the heater ,the second part,that funny looking coil
is simply a coil its purpose is to generate current to the third part,the third part
is used as a step down transformer.The third part of the transformer supplies
power to the various circuits and closes the loop.With kapanadze dead did hes sons continue
making devices or was the secret gone with kapanadze.
   

Hero Member
*****

Posts: 557


Buy me some coffee
I made some inquiries with one Georgian contact, and he said no one knows the secret or how he did it.


---------------------------
Electrostatic induction: Put a 1KV charge on 1 plate of a capacitor. What does the environment do to the 2nd  plate?
   

Hero Member
*****

Posts: 557


Buy me some coffee
The Bedini guy again. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAkkdGXs40c
At 24 minutes, he states that Rich Friedrich is advising him.
Happy New Year to everyone.


---------------------------
Electrostatic induction: Put a 1KV charge on 1 plate of a capacitor. What does the environment do to the 2nd  plate?
   
Group: Tinkerer
Full Member
***

Posts: 166
Aking.21
Were you present at the aquarium 2 presentation?
In one part of the video ,the person a British guy lifts the device and turns it almost upside down
the heater turns off.Very important part if the device uses gravity to power it.
The active component, the transformer must be flat since gravity is a vertical force,turning it at an angle would reduce the power output a reduced current would cause the heater to go out.In my opinion both this device and the tpu
convert gravity energy to electrical energy.
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 516
If device was heavy then I suppose because of lots of ferrite inside ;-) O0
   
Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3081
To understand new technology we could look at history and old technology.

Think of the Antikythera mechanism, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-well-did-the-mysterious-antikythera-mechanism-actually-work-180986451/

A 2000 year old ancient Greek analogue computer that was used to predict astronomical positions and eclipses decades in advance. This was 1750 years before the U.S. even existed. 500 years before Christopher Columbus discovered the Americas.

It makes sense because our history is represented incorrectly. People tend to think of the average person 2000 years ago not the 1% of wealth and influence who had advanced technology. These were small groups of scientists and engineers who had the spare time to invent stuff and explore new ideas unlike the average person just trying to survive. Leonardo da Vinci is a good example of a person far ahead of his time. Many of Leonardo da Vinci's ideas were 400 years or 15 generations ahead of his time. I can only imagine where we will be in 400 years.

Most people make the same mistake today thinking the technology we know about is as good as it gets. Obviously this isn't the case, it never is if history is any indication. There are always small groups of people developing advanced technology we may never see. So this false notion that one person can do no better than anyone else is beyond absurd in my opinion.



---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
   
Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2477
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAkkdGXs40c

Another DIY enthusiast in his garage who claims to talk about science and physics. What he says makes no sense, no reasoning, just gibberish, but ‘thousands of amps’ as he says, and sparks, impress the ignorant. He is seeking funds through GoFundMe and has acolytes who, through their comments, praise his approach. Go ahead, suckers, keep the crooks in business, and you'll be the first to get free electricity.
« Last Edit: 2026-02-06, 17:01:43 by F6FLT »


---------------------------
"Open your mind, but not like a trash bin"
   
Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3081
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAkkdGXs40c

Another DIY enthusiast in his garage who claims to talk about science and physics. What he says makes no sense, no reasoning, just gibberish, but ‘thousands of amps’ as he says, and sparks, impress the ignorant. He is seeking funds through GoFundMe and has acolytes who, through their comments, praise his approach. Go ahead, suckers, keep the crooks in business, and you'll be the first to get free electricity.

That's a bad analogy considering some of the wealthiest most successful people like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos literally got started in their garage with a crazy idea. Elon Musk doesn't count because apparently his daddy gave him a few million to buy into an existing company.

I think it's cool that people are getting others interested in this kind of thing and doing real experiments. I don't see it as science vs experimenters but people who do nothing vs people who try to find answers by experiment. Science and experimenters have much more in common than people who do nothing.

We also need to be careful about people telling others what to think and how to spend their own money.









---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
   
Group: Tinkerer
Full Member
***

Posts: 166
F6FLT do you believe  free energy is possible,that is a device that produces
free energy with out an apparent source.Do you believe in general relativity as an explanation for gravity
where gravity is not a force but a curvature of space.Do you believe all free energy devices are fake.
   

Group: Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 4535
Do you believe in general relativity as an explanation for gravity where gravity is not a force but a curvature of space.
I vehemently disagree with that notion.
Any objectification of a reference system (space) is repugnant to me.
   
Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2477
F6FLT do you believe  free energy is possible,that is a device that produces
free energy with out an apparent source.Do you believe in general relativity as an explanation for gravity
where gravity is not a force but a curvature of space.Do you believe all free energy devices are fake.

All free energy devices are fake or errors, until proven otherwise, which we are still waiting for. That said, there is no reason to believe that we cannot produce virtually free energy, because compared to the energies and forces at work in the universe, human needs are insignificant. But only if we can get it from somewhere.

As far as GR is concerned, your question makes no sense to me. In science, we don't operate within a belief system. We have models, GR being one of them. A model is validated by the accuracy of its predictions in relation to observations and measurements within a certain domain of validity, and as long as we don't have anything better, we use it.
You can believe whatever you want, but that won't help you synchronize GPS clocks.

That's the whole difference between science and the pseudoscience of “free energy.”
Only the former can produce devices that work. Today, “free energy” is 95% esotericism, insubstantial gibberish that never amounts to anything. It will become science when it has a replicable device that works and can explain how it works.

« Last Edit: 2026-02-07, 11:06:43 by F6FLT »


---------------------------
"Open your mind, but not like a trash bin"
   
Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3081
I agree that to call something science it must be demonstrable and able to be reproduced. Science is the observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena.

However we have many problems yet to be solved. For example, free energy implies something can be more than the sum of it's parts which seems absurd. I mean it's like saying we could throw a bunch of inanimate particles together and get something more than a bunch of particles. Silly right?.

Oh wait, if this were true then none of you can exist. In fact we as humans are just a large group of molecules and atoms made of Protons, Electrons and Neutrons. Were made of exactly the same supposedly inanimate stuff as everything else and yet here we are a living conscious being. It's weird that a supposed scientist who claims something cannot be more than the sum of it's parts can see demonstrable and reproducible proof how wrong they are every time they look in a mirror.

Here's a clue, science can borrow material from existing life and reproduce it like planting a seed but have no idea how to create a seed from inanimate material. In fact they have no idea how to create a self-sustaining, evolving living system like nature does. We can plant a seed and the first thing it does is start extracting and converting the energy and materials all around it to sustain itself and grow. The larger the plant grows the more energy and materials it can extract to grow even more. I'm not claiming this is free energy only that we have demonstrable proof that some systems can self-organize, self-sustain themselves and extract energy from the environment.

So this notion of "free energy" is a red herring in my opinion and it's not required to do what we want. What we want is a self-sustaining system which can extract energy from the environment and we already have more than enough demonstrable proof this is possible. Nature and life is our proof.


---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
   

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 407
What happens if you mix an explosive with a piezoelectric substance and detonate it ?  ;)
   
Group: Professor
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 2477
...
For example, free energy implies something can be more than the sum of it's parts which seems absurd.
....

Strictly speaking, I agree. But unless we are fundamentalists, we must take a more moderate view of ‘free energy’,  namely energy that does not require a great deal of effort or money to obtain.
This does not imply that it is created from nothing, but that it is available, like the air we breathe.


---------------------------
"Open your mind, but not like a trash bin"
   
Group: Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3081
Strictly speaking, I agree. But unless we are fundamentalists, we must take a more moderate view of ‘free energy’,  namely energy that does not require a great deal of effort or money to obtain.
This does not imply that it is created from nothing, but that it is available, like the air we breathe.

I agree and found it difficult to hold multiple perspectives at once. To be an engineer where everything must be demonstrable and practical versus quantum mechanics and naturalism.

In some sense normalcy is a big problem and we tend to take many things for granted imo. I keep coming back to the idea of a seed and self-organizing self-sustaining systems which seem far beyond our capacity to replicate. It's like saying I'm going to take this handful of ordinary dirt and transform it into a self-organizing, self-sustaining living thing capable of growing and reproducing itself. The technology to replicate a seed is so far beyond the scope of our intelligence and yet it is considered normal and insignificant.

So we need to be careful of our perspective and nothing should be normalized imo. We should see thing for what they are in reality not what others tell us to believe.


---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
   
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2026-02-12, 03:37:18