PopularFX
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome,Guest. Please login or register.
2025-12-18, 17:55:03
News: If you have a suggestion or need for a new board title, please PM the Admins.
Please remember to keep topics and posts of the FE or casual nature. :)

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19]
Author Topic: Tariel kapanadze's Energy Generator  (Read 445567 times)

Sr. Member
****

Posts: 370
From this impulse, the magnets inside the secondary coil will compress some substance, which will generate a current that will go to the load through the secondary coil, which will maintain compression until the current from the substance is depleted.
   
Full Member
***

Posts: 119
If you trust this drawing, then the energy-producing substance is located between the turns of the "Tesla bifilaria", as it is written there.
The meaning of the bifilar coil, as Tesla himself stated, is in greater energy accumulation due to the equality of potential along the entire length of the winding.
If you take this literally, to modern technologies, lithium batteries have a similar design. In these batteries, energy accumulation occurs between the turns of a flat bifilar coil, between two strips of copper foil twisted into a roll, between which the charge carrier and the insulating membrane "separator" are located.
But regarding Kapanadze, in this case, battery technologies are not suitable due to the low energy density. To implement a storage device that could shine 5 kilowatt lamps for tens of minutes, technologies are needed that are hundreds of times superior to the best modern batteries.

About the voltage per cell. With the maximum voltage currently available at about 4 volts, generating  AC 220 V in such a design would require more than 50 elements, which is hard to imagine being placed in the volume of the device in Kapanadze's video.
If you follow the diagram from the crumpled sheet, each element should produce about 30 volts 26 amperes.

In that case it's better to take capacitor from inverter welding or from frequency converter.
They are designed for high power. :)
Yes, probably, electrolytic capacitors with screw terminals for frequency converters are also capable of discharging a large current. But according to the datasheet, they are mainly rated for an average pulse current, which is not that great, often 6-12 amperes. In addition, it would be difficult to find such capacitors of small capacity 100-200 μF.
« Last Edit: 2025-09-03, 15:20:25 by sergh »
   

Hero Member
*****

Posts: 555


Buy me some coffee
I'm looking for a link between Bedini, Don Smith, and Kapanadze. One thing they have in common is the use of flyback energy created by frequency generator square wave pulsing.
Bedini does it mechanically, Smith and Kapandze do it electronically. A DC-DC converter enables control of high voltages by pulsing the low-voltage side of the converter, thus simplifying the electronics.
The electrolytic capacitor is important because it enables a pass-through of electricity, whereas a normal capacitor can act as a blocking device.


---------------------------
Electrostatic induction: Put a 1KV charge on 1 plate of a capacitor. What does the environment do to the 2nd  plate?
   
Sr. Member
****

Posts: 293
The electrolytic capacitor is important because it enables a pass-through of electricity, whereas a normal capacitor can act as a blocking device.

How does an electrolytic capacitor enable pass through whereas a non polarized capacitor does not? Wouldn't both block DC, once they're fully charged?

Electrolytic capacitors are generally polarized so will only work one-way. They are only suitable for DC and won't work for AC. They have positive and negative terminals. You can put two of them back to back and they will then work for AC.

Non polarized capacitors don't have fixed positive and negative terminals and can flip one way or the other, so are suitable for both AC and DC.
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3054
Ifarrand
Quote
How does an electrolytic capacitor enable pass through whereas a non polarized capacitor does not? Wouldn't both block DC, once they're fully charged?
Electrolytic capacitors are generally polarized so will only work one-way. They are only suitable for DC and won't work for AC. They have positive and negative terminals. You can put two of them back to back and they will then work for AC.
Non polarized capacitors don't have fixed positive and negative terminals and can flip one way or the other, so are suitable for both AC and DC.

This is good example why building and experiments are important.

First, every capacitor is AC because the charge current is in one direction which then "alternates" in the opposite direction on discharge. However in experiments I learned an electrolytic capacitor has leakage when reversed biased over the rated voltage. As such it can act like a capacitor and a threshold device. Similar in action to a reversed biased 2N2222A NPN transistor in a negative resistance circuit.

Many claim this electrolytic leakage causes failure but I never saw it. I ran countless hours with no problems so long as any heat buildup was managed. I use strips of aluminum roof flashing which I corrugate and wrap around a component as a heat sink.   

Quote
You can put two of them back to back and they will then work for AC.

I do this all the time but there's more to it. Suppose we have two caps A and B back to back. Cap A is 50uF@100v and cap B 100uF@200v. When the voltage exceeds 100v cap A can start leaking overcharging B relative to A. If we add another conductor between AB this becomes a capacitor based current regulator/splitter based on the amount of leakage through A, the applied voltage and the difference in capacity between AB. We are only limited by our imagination here and there are countless applications.

It's funny because a supposed expert might see this and claim it's evidence the builder is an amateur. Similar to reversed diodes or back to back diodes as threshold devices or series oscillators few understand. However these are armchair experts with little hands on experience. A real expert understands all the properties of the components to such an extent they can find new and creative uses for them.

This is why when looking at a FE patent I always look for all the missing or out of place components. Most people are 100% predictable and do things based on repetition unlike inventors.

For example, I once used a 12v battery as a HV capacitor. So I wrapped the lower part of the battery in aluminum sheet as one plate of a capacitor and used all of the (+) and (-) battery plates as the second capacitor plate. Logically it is a capacitor like any other and has two sets of conductors separated by an insulator. However now things get fuzzy, the total voltage on a (+) or (-) battery conductor can be +6, -6 plus the potential of our external capacitor/battery plate. How many people do you suppose would notice something like this in a circuit?. My guess is very few so we need to pay attention. 

AC


---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
   

Group: Experimentalist
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3914


Buy me a beer
If I may add to your post Don 8)


In the image attached is another different form of interreactive capacitance.

A and B are charged from separate sources, the + plates are A and B with the negative plates being 1 and 2.

They all have a common capacitance because of the way they are wound.

The external circuit I have not shown, but it exists, and also is a bit exceptional.

Many years of bench work as you know Don.

By the way, I have lost your email over the years, PM me.

Mike


---------------------------
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860

As a general rule, the most successful person in life is the person that has the best information.
   
Hero Member
*****

Posts: 3054
Hey Centraflow

That's an interesting setup which I have seen in many patents over the years. One used mercury rectifiers in parallel with the coils in the circuits A and B. Others rectifiers possibly also used as threshold devices and spark gaps in series with A and B. It took me a long time to figure out what they were doing and it's very non-intuitive to the average person.

I think the best but also the most elusive devices used no switches. It was all measured corona gap effects as a delay function merged with capacitance and inductance to sequence the operation. By appearances it may not even look like an electrical device. This is next level technology which gives me headaches.

Hope you and your work are doing well.


---------------------------
Comprehend and Copy Nature... Viktor Schauberger

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool.”― Richard P. Feynman
   
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19]
« previous next »


 

Home Help Search Login Register
Theme © PopularFX | Based on PFX Ideas! | Scripts from iScript4u 2025-12-18, 17:55:03