Hi Brad,
I am aware of this "effect" i.e. using inferior ferromagnetic cores with 'built-in' eddy current losses and this loss is reduced by the counter flux when the output coil is electrically loaded and the counter flux appear in the core.
I hope though that they are little bit more "advanced" than that... 
time will tell.
Thanks,
Gyula
From the video's i have seen,they make there own cores ,B-d-n- style,using cut up welding rods.
The device i used as the generator in my tests,was a well made stepper motor,which use insulated silicon steel core plates.
One easy test i suggested to them was to run the motor without the generator attached,and get the power consumption for the motor.
Run the test again with the generator attached,but no load across the generator,and once again get the motors power consumption.
The other test is simple.
Place a load on the generator.
Calculate P/in to the motor,and calculate P/out of the generator.
They claim to have done this,and the result was 300 watts in,and 1800 watts out.
When asked for video proof,there was no time !apparently!.
Dave said he would show us in 4 months--that was 6 months ago.
Now the release time has shifted to the end of this year-2019.
The device is also now solid state-no more COP 600% generator.
Now,why would you drop any device that runs at a 600% efficiency ?--even if you had a solid state version.
The solid state version has already failed,as they fail to see the current loop they are taking there measurements from.
This is painfully clear when looking at the schematic,where they think they also have power returning to the battery--where they do not.
The very same mistake is made by the bed-ni fans,when measuring P/in and P/out of the simple SSG.
Come the end of 2019,there will be no OU device from Matt and Dave-ill bet on that.
Brad
Never let your schooling get in the way of your education.
Author
Topic: Generating System (Read 56768 times)
