As I suspected.
What is left is to put this effect on the benches of people reading this, with a thorough understanding of why and how it does what it does. This would be knowledge we cannot afford to lose again.
We have been provided with wonderful more or less self explanatory proof of principle devices which can aid in our understanding. Those concept devices are not being used as aids, they have become products, building blocks they may have been, today they are reduced to and limited by ignorance in the most terrible sense. You must ask the following questions, and recognize the provided conclusion for what they are.
Is there a deeper meaning to be associated with the concept of shunt winding?
• Shunt wound = Parallel Resonant Circuit
Is there a deeper meaning to be associated with the concept of series winding?
• Series wound = Series Resonant Circuit
Is there a deeper meaning to be associated with the concept of compound winding?
• Compound wound = Parallel - Series Resonant Circuit
Do I have any proof of this, it's a funny question, one which I don't answer when asked, I respond with a follow up question, do I need proof, can you prove the idea wrong......I don't think you can?
Why would they go through all that trouble to design very specific what some would call resonant circuits, I call them "reactive" circuits, the first catering specifically to either magnetic energy storage, the second to dielectric energy storage, and then a third, a hybrid which combined the two? Powerful implications.... Resonant implies that the circuits are limited to operating at one specific frequency, were as the term reactive does not, to facilitate runaway, we cannot be limited to one frequency of operation.
In my most humble of opinions a message was preserved, one which has stood the test of time. One which is wasted on 99% of us consumers.
A warning gentlemen and ladies. My koolaid is bitter. I don't do numbers, the ones I feel all are chasing are the wrong ones anyway. The energy I want is in capacitance, born out of the capacitor's opposition to changes in voltage. Before I can get it out, I have to make the case for capacitance in a situation where there is no case (parasitic capacitance doesn't count). When that happens fiction replaces fact and fact fiction, in such an instance, a device mentioned in a movie can become real.....(Flux Capacitor.....go on....laugh....Hollywood is probably laughing too...) a coil's inductive property opposes changes in current, reaction to change in current is an induced potential, a potential which rises and falls, opposition to changes in the induced potential result in current. A greater portion of this induced current is being transmitted via a longitudinally operating magnetic field. Do I have proof? No, I just take things for what they are, I observe where I am told to look for the coils capacitance, and note that there's something interesting going on at this location, namely, the magnetic field at this location is bucking. We aren't ignorant to this, but we don't take advantage of the fact either.
Regards
Author
Topic: Flux Gate Interrupter, BEMF Redirector (Read 323589 times)
