I posted this back in June 2008 back at OU. I was told I "missed the point" by "aether22". I can refute his critique, but will leave the reader to decide.
Several mysteries with this patent:
1. Why does Barbat not put his "sending coil" co-axially inside a magnifying coil made of copper tubing with a treated inside surface (photoconductive) such that all of the photonic induction can impinge on the inside surface of the magnifying coil tube.
A co-axial approach such as this would minimize radiated losses. Alternately a long copper pipe with inside surface treated and co-axial with a wire running from end to end as the sending coil. With suitably spaced insulating washers or beads, this assembly could be wound into a coil and put into a pot core to completely contain stray fields.
2. Barbat has me confused in saying that normal transformer action is the result of photonic induction. If this is true, the photons have no trouble going through opaque insulating paper and wire varnish in a typical transformer. But then his arrangements seem to imply the photonic induction is like visible light and carefully places his devices to optimize direct illumination as if it were light.? Barbat tries to make the case that normal radio waves are the result of photonic induction into and out of antenna structures and then extends this to normal transformer action. Wikipedia seems to agree (def:photon)
3. The magnifying coil in fig.1a, 2a and 3 represent a shorted transformer winding. This would cause extreme absorption of energy and heating of the magnifying coil. All of the energy will go to this winding in the form of heat, and nothing will be left for the output winding. Am I missing something? Now if it works, I don't mind having such a heater, but how does he get useful work into his output winding with a shorted winding absorbing everything?
Edit: After having thought about this it is possible to get some induction, as the magnifying coil will not be 100% absorptive of all flux.
Some ideas:
Does anyone think this will work? Purchase some 1/4 or 3/8 O.D. copper tubing. Clean the inside by circulating a mild acid using a small pump. Rinse with water, then circulate peroxide for as long as necessary.. Rinse again with water. Should have a nice uniform oxide coating on the inside.
Now thread a cotton insulated copper wire (sending coil) through the center of the copper tubing. The entire assembly can be formed onto a bobbin and set into a magnetic structure such as a large ferrite pot core.
Activating the sending coil, all of the photonic induction will impinge on the photoconductor on the inside wall of the tube, as they are co-axial. This should make the assembly highly efficient.
If you like you can add the work coil to the bobbin as an outer winding on top of the magnifying coil., but as is should make a pretty good heater if the kind of gains Barbat is claiming are anywhere near true.
Another method for oxidizing copper tubing interior would be to heat the tubing, while slowly running some pure oxygen through it. ============================================================= Could this be the missing ingredient in the SM TPU? It satisfies several of the criteria, non-reciprocal induction, runs with gain, feeds on it self, and generates excess heat in the main coil.
SM used a lot of zip cord in his devices, which is normally unplated copper and subject to oxidation. I've stripped back a lot of old zipcord and it is usually extremely oxidized and must be cleaned before it is able to take solder. Would this make it photoconductive?
If this has any truth, what we have been calling collectors are actually the emitters, and the toroidal winding of zipcord could be the collector.
« Last Edit: 2010-12-15, 18:10:50 by ION »
---------------------------
"Secrecy, secret societies and secret groups have always been repugnant to a free and open society"......John F Kennedy
|